

2,814,904
That's not really the pareto principle. But, while the expected dollar value is the same, I'd go for the $200 w/ greater odds..because I'd still be thrilled to win $200...and not much of a difference of happiness w/ $800. So, overall, I'd come out ahead w/ the added happiness.
-
Praful Thakkar
Andover, MA
4,799,763
1,027,535
This is more of a measure of who is risk averse. I'd roll the dice and try for the $800. I'm almost always lucky at the slots, so I'm thinking this will be same.
-
Praful Thakkar
Andover, MA
50,210
80% of "effect" comes from 20% of the "causes" ...
I'd take the $200 but the 80/20 rule I think is based more around effort and work put in to get something out as opposed to a matter of chance.
-
Praful Thakkar
Andover, MA
1,620,406
1,466,027
Praful Thakkar The 80% chance of winning $200 is more in your favor. In theory, according to the Pareto principle, since 20% causes 80% of the effect, the chance of winning $800 would seem more likely. When it comes to gambling, I would still go with the odds of winning.
-
Praful Thakkar
Andover, MA
4,433,859
4,657,239
I'd go for the $200--the odds are with me. (And maybe the force is with me, too!)
-
Praful Thakkar
Andover, MA
2,759,687
I would choose the $200. The $200 can be invested and earn interest. Besides, the odds are more your favor.
-
Praful Thakkar
Andover, MA
630,101
3,071,034
3,987,310
4,318,202
You are right - this has nothing to do with Pareto Principle - this question has something to do with psychology.
People who opted for $200 are 'safe' and those who opted for $800 are risk takers.
What did you choose?